Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Housing
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
Approve the indicative mix, budgets and procuremnt route for the redevelopments.
Matter
for Decision:
The report provided
details of the proposed redevelopment of the final three sites that, together,
will complete the investment of the £2.6 million capital grant from the Homes and
Communities Agency (HCA) by the end of March 2015 to provide 146 new Affordable
Housing dwellings (the 146 Programme). The three sites were all garage sites. A
fourth site had been included in the report that involved the potential
redevelopment of a disused drying area. The proposal for the fourth site is
related to the Council’s development of land at Clay Farm and involves the
provision of two new houses to at least Level 5 of the Code for Sustainable
Homes as prototypes for the Clay Farm development.
The report
highlighted that in addition to the use of the HCA grant there was the
opportunity to invest capital receipts from the Right to Buy (RTB) programme.
Decision of Executive Councillor
for Housing:
The Executive
Councillor resolved, for each of the following:
a. 301 to 326
Hawkins Road Garages.
b. 11 to 45 Ekins
Road Garages
c. Fulbourn Road
Garages
d. Disused Drying Area at
Anstey Way
to:
i.
Approve
the continuation of site feasibility work, noting the indicative schemes and
the tenure mix options.
ii.
Approve
that delegated authority be given to the Director of Customer and Community
Services following consultation with the Director of Resources (or any
equivalent successor post),
Executive Councillor for Housing, Chair and Spokes to agree a
final scheme and budget for each site based on the tenure mix that optimises
the use of HCA and RTB receipts for the HRA Business Plan.
iii.
Approve
that delegated authority be given to the Director of Customer and Community
Services following consultation with the Director of Resources (or any
equivalent successor post) and the Head of Legal Services to seal a Development
Agreement with the Council’s preferred house-builder/developer partners.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Head of Strategic
Housing regarding the Council New Build Programme. He highlighted the inclusion potential grant from the Homes and
Communities Agency and Right to Buy receipts in the
decision and the need for flexibility. Members noted the following correction
to the recommendations where appropriate : that
consultation shoud be with the Director of Resources
(or any equivalent successor post)
The Committee made the following comments in response to the
report.
i.
The
possibility of delivering the plan with a higher than expected proportion of
Council Housing was welcomed.
ii.
The
Committee welcomed the savings to be achieved by allowing two properties to be
built as prototypes for the Clay Farm development.
iii.
The
plans in place to work with future residents on how to get the best results
from the Code 5 features of their homes were welcomed.
iv.
Members
were assured that the properties would be allocated using the standard Homelink process. However, potential residents, both owner
occupiers and tenants, would be made aware that their utility bills would be
monitored for an initial period.
v.
Members
were concerned that internal storage would be sacrificed in order to
accommodate code 5 technology. Officers stated that the design features of the
house used passive measures to achieve energy savings rather than technology.
vi.
Members
questioned the demand for one bedroom properties and how future demand was
assessed. A member briefing on future housing needs was suggested.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the amended
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Publication date: 29/10/2013
Date of decision: 10/10/2013