Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
Matter for Decision:
The report requested authority to commence the preliminary
stages of an EU procurement process to invite and evaluate expressions of
interest for progression to tender on the full specification from July 2012 for
the running of the City Councils Leisure Management portfolio for October 2013
onwards.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Art
Sport and Public Places:
The Executive Councillor resolved:
To approve:
i.
Authority for commencement of stage one of a procurement
exercise to advertise a Pre Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) to the open
market place.
To note:
ii.
The project plan and timetable for a full EU procurement
exercise for the Leisure Management contract, culminating in the approval of
the specification to tender at Community Services Scrutiny Committee in June
2012.
iii.
A plan for consultation with stakeholders and Councillors
over relevant aspects of the specification.
iv.
The feedback obtained from the recent survey of the Cherry Hinton
Village Centre, which will inform and input into the specification.
Reason for the Decision:
Leisure
management has been externalised for nearly 20 years in Cambridge and the
current Leisure management contract held by SLM Ltd will expire at the end of
September 2013.
Any alternative options considered and
rejected:
Not applicable
Scrutiny Considerations:
The committee
received a report from the Sports and Recreation Manager regarding the Leisure
Management Contract.
Councillor Dryden
suggested that the Localism Act would allow local community groups to tender
for this sort of contract and asked if the decision could be delayed to allow
the time for this. The Executive Councillor responded by stating that this part of the
Localism Act has not yet been brought into effect and the position on tenders
by community groups was not yet clear. The existing contract had already been
extended once and it would not be possible to extend it a second time.
In response to
members’ questions, the Officer confirmed that the Village Centre was viewed
primarily as a sports venue with limited community rooms. The consultation
process would address the community use of the venue.
He further
confirmed that Carbon Reduction targets would be embedded in the contract. This
would be linked to management fees and would be included in the contract
specifications.
The Scrutiny Committee considered and
endorsed the recommendations in the report by 6
votes to 0.
The
Executive Councillor for Arts, Sport and Public Places approved the
recommendations.
Conflicts of interest declared by the
Executive Councillor (and any dispensations granted)
N/A
Publication date: 09/02/2012
Date of decision: 12/01/2012