A Cambridge City Council website

Cambridge City Council

Council and democracy

Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details

Decision details

17/2196/FUL - Hinton Grange Nursing Home, 55 Bullen Close

Decision Maker: Planning

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decisions:

The Committee received an application for full planning permission.

 

The application sought approval for demolition of the existing buildings and redevelopment of the site to provide a replacement care home (Use Class C2) arranged over three storeys together with associated car parking, landscaping and amenity space

 

The Planner updated her report by referring to the amendment sheet. This in turn was revised at committee (as shown in bold and struck through text):

 

Pre-Committee Amendments to Recommendation: The wording of the travel plan condition has been amended from ‘prior to occupation’ to ‘within 6 months of first occupation of the building’ as the Travel Plan cannot be finalised until staff are in place and have been interviewed.

 

15. Within 6 month of the first occupation of the building, a Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.  The Travel Plan shall specify the methods to be used to discourage the use of the private motor vehicle and the arrangements to encourage use of alternative sustainable travel arrangements such as public transport, car sharing, cycling and walking. The Travel Plan shall be implemented as approved upon the occupation of the development and monitored in accordance with details to be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

 

Reason: In the interests of encouraging sustainable travel to and from the site (Cambridge Local Plan 2006, policies 8/2, 8/3 and 8/4).

 

The Committee received a representation in objection to the application from a resident of Bullen Close.

 

The representation covered the following issues:

     i.        The nursing home backs onto her property. The application would replace a garden with a carpark where the two properties adjoin.

    ii.        Expressed concerns about:

a.   Light, noise and emission pollution from the car park.

b.   The lack of a solid barrier between her property and the large unmonitored car park. This would create security issues.

c.   Loss of privacy and overlooking.

   iii.        Requested (if planning permission were granted):

a.   A secure traffic planning condition.

b.   Controls over lighting in the car park etc to mitigate the impact on neighbouring properties.

c.   Redesigning (garden) screening so that neighbours’ properties are not overlooked.

 

Mr Kearley (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the Committee in support of the application.

 

Councillor Herbert (Coleridge Ward Councillor) addressed the Committee about the application.

 

The representation covered the following issues:

     i.        Referred to his representation on P58 of the Officer’s report.

    ii.        Expressed specific concern regarding:

a.   Increased height and scale of building would dominate neighbouring properties on Cherry Hinton Road and Bullen Close.

1.               Suggested the new building would be 6m from the boundary not 14m as per the Officer’s report.

2.               Neighbours felt this was an overdevelopment of site and had general security concerns. The number of nursing home residents would increase to 64.

3.               There appeared to be confusion in the Officer’s report about the impact of the application on 428 and 430 Cherry Hinton Road.

b.   Security of neighbouring property (43 Bullen Close).

1.               Screening would be removed so people could access 43 Bullen Close through the nursing home’s large unattended carpark. Requested a solid boundary wall and security camera be installed as part of planning conditions.

c.   The need to protect trees on the nursing home property, particularly during building work.

1.               Requested condition 7 be amended to protect new and existing trees.

d.   The impact of the application on existing nursing home residents. The Officer’s report only referred to new residents.

1.               Queried why the existing building would be demolished instead of renovated.

2.               Queried what information had been given to existing residents about timescales and where they will be moved to. Information had not been forthcoming from Care UK who managed the nursing home.

 

The Planner responded to points made in the representations:

     i.        The security of 43 Bullen Close could be addressed through Condition 6 which relates to boundary treatment. A security camera could not be requested.

    ii.        The Planning Department required details of lighting to be submitted before occupation of the building through condition 14.

   iii.        Condition 7 contained an error. It should refer to new and existing trees. The Planner summarised revised wording for the Committee.

  iv.        The new building would be 14m from the boundary. The ‘T’ shaped part of it would be 6m from the boundary.

   v.        The new building would provide 63 bedrooms and increase from the existing 58 bedrooms.

 

Councillor Thornburrow proposed amendments to the Officer’s recommendation to include a condition requiring tree protection during construction.

 

Councillor Blencowe proposed amendments to the Officer’s recommendation to include conditions requiring:

     i.        A carpark management and monitoring plan.

    ii.        A construction traffic management plan.

 

The amendments were carried nem con.

 

The Committee:

 

Resolved (by 8 votes to 1) to grant the application for planning permission in accordance with the officer recommendation, for the reasons set out in the officer report, and subject to the conditions recommended by the officers; plus amendments to conditions 7 and 15, three new conditions regarding construction traffic management, car park management and monitoring and tree protection.

 

7.      If within 5 years of implementation of the permission, any tree or shrub show on Drawing PL03 Rev E is removed, uprooted, destroyed or dies or becomes, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority seriously damaged or defective, another tree or shrub of the same species and size as that originally shown on the plan shall be planted at the same place, unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.

 

          Reason: To ensure the provision of amenity afforded by the proper maintenance of existing and/or new landscape features. (Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policies 3/4, 3/12 and 3/11)

 

15.    Within 6 month of the first occupation of the building, a Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.  The Travel Plan shall specify the methods to be used to discourage the use of the private motor vehicle and the arrangements to encourage use of alternative sustainable travel arrangements such as public transport, car sharing, cycling and walking. The Travel Plan shall be implemented as approved and monitored in accordance with details to be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

 

          Reason: In the interests of encouraging sustainable travel to and from the site (Cambridge Local Plan 2006, policies 8/2, 8/3 and 8/4).

 

22.    No demolition or construction shall commence on site until a traffic management plan has been agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Works shall thereafter be in accordance with the approved details.

 

Reason: in the interests of highway safety in accordance with policy 8/2 of the Cambridge Local Plan (2006)

 

23     Prior to the occupation of the replacement care home a Car Park Management and Monitoring strategy shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Management and monitoring of the car park shall thereafter be in accordance with the approved details.

 

          Reason: to ensure the car park is management in a way which would not adversely impact on the amenity of 43 Bullen Close (Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policy 3/7).

 

24     Prior to the commencement of development a site visit will be arranged with the City Council’s Tree Officer to agree on tree protection measure for the protection of the retained trees on site, as shown in Drawing PL03 Rev E, during construction.  Details of the specification and position of fencing, or any other measures to be taken for the protection of any trees from damage during the course of development, shall be submitted to the local planning authority for its written approval, and implemented in accordance with that approval before any equipment, machinery or materials are brought onto the site for the purpose of development (including demolition). The agreed means of protection shall be retained on site until all equipment, and surplus materials have been removed from the site. Nothing shall be stored or placed in any area protected in accordance with this condition, and the ground levels within those areas shall not be altered nor shall any excavation be made without the prior written approval of the local planning authority.

 

          Reason: To protect the visual amenity of the area and to ensure the retention of the trees on the site. (Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policies 3/4, 3/11, 3/12 and 4/4).

Report author: Mairead O'Sullivan

Publication date: 22/06/2018

Date of decision: 06/06/2018

Decided at meeting: 06/06/2018 - Planning

Accompanying Documents: