Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision details
Decision Maker: Planning
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
The Committee
received an application for full planning permission.
The application
sought approval for the change of use from the implemented use as a class D1
dance school/studio (granted under planning permission 14/1252/FUL) to general educational
use within use class D1 including limited alterations to the external
appearance of the building & associated landscaping works
The Committee received representations in objection to the application
from 4 residents who live in the surrounding area:
The representations covered the following issues:
i.
If the application for change of
use was granted it would stop public access to the building and the residents
would lose it as a community facility.
ii.
Claimed that the applicants were
not currently adhering to the conditions granted in the original permission and
therefore should not be granted further permission.
iii.
Local dance schools were looking
for new premises but had had not been made aware of this building, they were
not encouraging community groups to use it.
iv.
The applicants had not applied for
a certificate of lawfulness because they could not prove that the building was
being used in the manner that the original permission had granted.
v.
Potentially losing the community
facility had caused a lot of distress amongst the community; they all
considered it to be a very important facility.
vi.
Commented that if the changes were
made to the units on the roof they would still be visible for half the year
when the surrounding trees were not in leaf.
The tenant of Cambridge School of Visual and Performing Arts addressed
the Committee in support of the application.
Councillor Robertson (Petersfield Ward Councillor) addressed the
Committee in objection to the application.
i.
Suggested that the conditions under the original
2004 permission had not been met therefore the applicant should be subject to
the 1997 conditions.
ii.
Supported the view that the current planning
permission should only be granted if pre-commencement conditions had been
discharged and use of the premises was solely a dance studio.
iii.
The loss of the community facility and protected
open space had a damaging impact on residents.
iv.
Commented that the applicants had a history of
cutting corners and undertaking unauthorised work.
v.
Suggested that the application did not preserve the
character of the conservation area.
The Committee:
Unanimously resolved to defer the
application to be brought back to committee with two additional reports dealing
with the issues separately ie one report regarding
whether permission 14/1252/FUL had been lawfully implemented and another
regarding the impact of the roof plant.
Report author: Mairead O'Sullivan
Publication date: 31/07/2017
Date of decision: 05/07/2017
Decided at meeting: 05/07/2017 - Planning
Accompanying Documents: