Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Glenn Burgess 01223 457169
No. | Item |
---|---|
Pre-application developer presentation to Councillors: Demolition
of existing buildings and erection of a new Travelodge Hotel, 180-190 Newmarket
Road. |
|
Apologies Minutes: None |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: None |
|
Pre-Application Presentation by the Developer - Eastern Gate Properties Limited Revised proposals for a
demolition of existing buildings and erection of a new Travelodge Hotel,
180-190 Newmarket Road. Minutes: Introduction
The Chair explained the role and purpose of
pre-application developer presentations to Councillors and the format of the
meeting. He referred to the guidance
contained in the agenda. Presentation by
the Developer Team
Colin
Brown explained the history of the site and the planning policy context. He referred to the site allocation in the
Cambridge Local Plan 2006 for a mixed use development, to the previous reserved
matters office permission on the site granted in 2006 (valid until March 2011),
and to the recent Travelodge hotel proposals. An appeal into the Council’s
refusal of the second hotel application in February 2010 had now been withdrawn
and his client now wished to discuss a revised proposal for the site that would
overcome previous concerns. He outlined
the key issues that he felt needed to be addressed in relation to the previous
reasons for refusal. Patrick
Llanaway said new traffic surveys had been undertaken at Travelodge sites in
Bath and Brighton, sites that had similar characteristics to the Newmarket Road
site. The profile of trip
arrivals/departures at the Bath site is considered to be more representative of
the Cambridge site. Comparative trip
arrival/departure information was shown, which he felt indicated that there
would be no undue traffic impacts from the Travelodge hotel at the Cambridge
site. Neil
Ruffles explained the key site characteristics and the proposed design changes,
which he felt were significant whilst retaining some of the original
thinking. A number of images were shown of the proposals including floor
plans, cross-sections, elevations, shadowing, perspectives, and
viewpoints. The main design changes
are: removal of top floor; internal space changes to achieve same number of
rooms; building to be timber framed and not of a pod design; new orthogonal
design to Newmarket Road to add interest, which also released internal space;
softer, semi-circular, elevation to Coldhams Lane; different palette of
external materials – ground, first and second floors brick (as at 35 Parkside),
top two floors cedar cladding; new canopied entrance; south elevation,
potential for trellising and climbing plants; smaller site coverage by building
(38%) compared to the previous office approval (48%); stronger landscaped
boulevard to Newmarket Road; redesigned canopy entrance; single storey only
extension at rear, taking advantage of natural light; ramp to underground car
park, all cars parked underground; access officer and police comments taken on
board; trees retained along Harvest Way; 2 metre high plant space on rooftop;
maximise opportunities for renewable energy; west elevation, modest escape
stair. Member questions and Developer responses Cllr
Walker: Seems more pleasing than the previous scheme. Visual appearance important because of impact on streetscape and
the Council’s wish to improve the planning of the area. Would like the parking arrangements to be
clarified. Will it all be underground? Cllr
Dixon: The shadowing diagrams need to be looked at carefully. Cllr
Pogonowski: The Council’s Eastern Gate visioning document has just been
released and a proposal for a new crossing from Godesdone Road. Has the impact of this been considered? Neil Ruffles: All the ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |